Ofsted says narrow curriculum is risk to quality of education

27 November 2018

On 31 October Amanda Spielman, the Chief Inspector wrote to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) to set out what Ofsted considers to be major risks to the quality of education and school effectiveness. 

Spielman identified these as ‘funding, the narrowing of the curriculum in schools, education structures, unregistered provision and off-rolling.’

Spielman pointed out that current evidence, based on school inspections shows no decline in standards, despite a decline in funding, but her caveat was that:

‘The current inspection framework is not designed to capture the effects of curriculum narrowing for schools that continue to meet statutory curriculum requirements. This is one of the reasons why we propose to change our framework.’

She went on to talk about a decline in the quality of education due to a narrowing of the curriculum, which of course we see in the decline of teacher numbers and time spent teaching arts subjects in schools and the knock-on effects on children’s access to the arts.

‘Where we do have clearer evidence of a decline in the quality of education are in the narrowing of the curriculum in schools and an endemic pattern of prioritising data and performance results, ahead of the real substance of education.’

Spielman also specifically highlighted access to the arts when talking about research which Ofsted had conducted on the curriculum:

‘In secondary schools, we found many examples of key stage 3 being narrowed to just two years. That means that pupils drop design and technology, art, music or languages after just two years of secondary study, often in very limited time each week.’

Shortened key stage 3

Our members have been reporting this issue of a shortened key stage 3: students who do not take arts GCSEs do not study them past age 13 or 14, and arts subjects are often on a carousel. Thus, children only experience an arts subject less than once a week, or perhaps just for one term a year. This makes progression and further study at GCSE level very difficult, as pupils do not have the base knowledge to embark on level 2 study.

To combat the problem of a narrowed curriculum Ofsted is proposing to change its inspection framework to include a judgement on ‘quality of education’.

Decline in FE funding

Spielman also used the letter to highlight the decline in funding for Further Education and Skills (FES):

‘I have expressed my concerns before, based on our inspection evidence, that the real-term cuts to FES funding are affecting the sustainability and quality of FES provision. My strong view is that the government should use the forthcoming spending review to increase the base rate for 16 to 18 funding.’


Read the full letter.


Image Credit: Leeds Museums and Galleries, Abbey House. Credit: Sarah Zagni. 

One Reply to "Ofsted says narrow curriculum is risk to quality of education"

  1. Absolutely true – my daughter has had to change schools and travel a long distance for sixth form as her school no longer offered any performing arts at A level nor photography nor any languages. All due to funding cuts which they said meant no subject viable if fewer than 15 -20 students. The sixth form offer therefore became impossibly narrow.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.